NASA: DISCLOSURE OR DECEIT?
Recent statements to FOX NEWS by NASA's chief scientist are shocking to say the least. Whether they are meant be shocking, informative or both remains to be scene. FOX NEWS reports:
"In a startling interview, NASA's Planetary Science Division director Jim Green, Ph.D., has said the space agency is close to "making some announcements" about finding life on Mars — but that we're not ready for it."
I'm not sure what is more shocking about that statement, a NASA leader implying that they have found life on Mars or his arrogance to think that only he and his fellow elite are ready for it. Given the government's record on disclosure I'm just not feeling the trust here.
The NASA bigwig goes on to say: “It will be revolutionary,” Green said in an interview with The Telegraph. “It’s like when Copernicus stated ‘no we go around the Sun.' Completely revolutionary. It will start a whole new line of thinking. I don’t think we’re prepared for the results. We’re not."
Unless they have found actually ruins on Mars with human like remains I kind of doubt it. I just don't see the world going crazy over fossilized pond scum. The world should probably be more concerned about the powers that be using this news to gain some greater advantage over the them.
The article goes on to say:
"He added that he's worried because he believes NASA is close to finding life and making an announcement about it but wonders what will happen afterward."
What will happen?That's pretty simple really. Given the history of deep-states throughout time the current batch in charge will let us know only what they deem is likely to offer them the most control.
If that means demeaning or altering religious beliefs for their own benefit then so be it. If that means causing civil unrest with panic inducing lies, so be it.
Real disclosure on the other hand, not so much. Remember these are the same people who have turned off telescopes and cameras and covered up space station windows when UFO's have showed up on the scene. Oh, and let's not forget the 'enhanced' photos blurring out the obvious evidence just in case of prying eyes.
Remembering this: Fans of the International Space Station got an eyeful recently when an alleged UFO appeared on NASA's live feed from the station. Curiously, the feed was interrupted as soon as the object appeared fueling rumors that NASA is engaged in a cover-up.
Finally we learn this in the FOX NEWS article when the quoted scientist says:
“When we first started the field of astrobiology in the 90s we started looking for extreme life," Green continued. "We go down in mines two miles deep into the Earth and if they were weeping with water they were full of life. We have gone in nuclear cesspools, places where you’d think nothing could survive, and they are full of life. And the bottom line is where there is water there is life."
This is stunning failure in logic coming from a so called scientist. Just because they find life in water on earth it in no way guarantees that life will be found in water on other planets. It is irresponsible to claim that because there is a correlation with water and life on earth that that must be the case in all other corners of of the Universe. There is zero scientific basis for a statement like this.
The article ends by telling us:
In June 2018, NASA made a stunning announcement, noting the Curiosity rover "found organic molecules in rocks from an ancient lake bed.” The rocks are billions of years old, NASA said, before adding it had not found life on the planet.
I think that statement qualifies as gobbledygook and doublespeak at the same time. Here is the definition of organic as it applies here:
2) : of, relating to, or derived from living organisms.
Why confuse the terms unless you want to control the narrative. It appears that NASA just like the NAVY wants disclosure on it's terms only and that my friends is not disclosure at all.
Comments
Post a Comment